Phase 2b·KEYNOTE-942·5-Year Update·NCT03897881

A therapy written
from a single tumor.

Intismeran autogene (mRNA-4157) — an individualized neoantigen therapy encoding up to 34 patient-specific mutations — plus pembrolizumab, versus pembrolizumab alone, in high-risk resected melanoma.

Recurrence-free survival
HR 0.51
95% CI 0.29–0.89
Distant metastasis-free
HR 0.41
95% CI 0.20–0.84
Overall survival
HR 0.47
95% CI 0.17–1.35
Scroll
0
Patients randomized, 2:1
0 / 0
Combination / pembrolizumab
0
Neoantigens encoded per dose (max)
0
Months median follow-up
0
% neoantigen design success
>0
% manufacturing success
01 — The clinical gap
Why resected melanoma still recurs

Surgery removes what you can see. The immune system has to find the rest.

Even after complete resection of stage IIIB–IV cutaneous melanoma, micrometastatic disease drives relapse. Adjuvant anti–PD-1 helps — but in this trial, with pembrolizumab alone an estimated 49.1% of patients remained recurrence-free at four years. Roughly half recurred.

KEYNOTE-942 asked a mechanistic question: could a vaccine built from each patient's own tumor mutations broaden and deepen the checkpoint-inhibitor response?

100 patients · pembrolizumab alone
Illustrative, based on the 4-year RFS estimate of 49.1%
Recurrence-free at 4 yr Recurred
02 — Mechanism of action
Two complementary forces

Release the brake. Then hand over the target.

Checkpoint blockade and neoantigen vaccination act on different steps of the anti-tumor immune response. Toggle between them to see how each contributes — and why the combination is more than the sum of its parts.

03 — Manufacturing
From biopsy to bespoke mRNA

Every dose is manufactured for one person.

The tumor's mutations are its fingerprint. Intismeran turns that fingerprint into an instruction set the immune system can read. Watch the pipeline, or step through it.

04 — Trial design
Randomized, open-label, stratified by stage

One year of dosing, every three weeks.

Experimental arm · n = 107
Intismeran + Pembrolizumab
Randomized 2 : 1
≤ 9 × intismeran 1 mg intramuscular, Q3W
+ ≤ 18 × pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenous, Q3W
Control arm · n = 50
Pembrolizumab alone
Standard adjuvant therapy
≤ 18 × pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenous, Q3W
Week 0 · Cycle 1 — pembrolizumab begins

Primary endpoint: RFS · Secondary: DMFS, safety · Exploratory: OS, biomarkers, antigen-specific T-cell responses. Treatment continued to maximum doses, recurrence, or unacceptable toxicity.

05 — Efficacy at five years
Kaplan–Meier estimates · descriptive analyses

A durable, widening survival gap.

Select an endpoint, then hover or drag across the curves to read the estimates and the number of patients still at risk at any time point.

Recurrence-free survival

Hazard ratio
0.51
95% CI 0.294–0.887
Intismeran + pembrolizumab
Pembrolizumab
● published landmark estimate (18/24/36/48 mo) with 95% CI
Hover or drag across the plot to explore  ·  four-year estimates highlighted below
06 — Proof of mechanism
T-cell receptor repertoire dynamics

The blood shows the vaccine working.

Serial TCR sequencing (baseline → cycle 2 → cycle 5 → long-term) tracked how the T-cell repertoire changed. The combination expanded new clones — and expansion tracked with staying cancer-free.

07 — Tolerability
No new safety signals at five years

Added benefit without the usual added toxicity.

Adding the vaccine increased low-grade, self-limited reactions but did not produce the severe toxicity seen when two systemic immunotherapies are combined.

10.6%
of combination patients had a grade 3 intismeran-related event (11 of 104)
0
grade 4 or grade 5 events attributed to intismeran
100% vs 84%
treatment-related adverse events — combination (104/104) vs pembrolizumab (42/50). Most were low-grade and self-limited.
08 — Interpretation & outlook
A mechanistically distinct approach

Where checkpoint-doublets failed, a neoantigen strategy held.

Prior adjuvant PD-1 combinations in melanoma
Phase 3 doublets that added toxicity without improving outcomes
CheckMate 915 · nivo + ipino benefit
RELATIVITY-098 · nivo + relano benefit
KEYVIBE-010 · pembro + vibono benefit
KEYNOTE-942 · pembro + intismeranRFS & DMFS ↑
Confirmatory trial · ongoing

INTerpath-001

A randomized phase 3 study (NCT05933577) is now testing intismeran + pembrolizumab in resected high-risk melanoma at scale — the trial that will determine the role of individualized neoantigen therapy in practice.

Benefit in KEYNOTE-942 was consistent across PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, ctDNA, and BRAF subgroups.

Interpret with these limitations
Small, phase 2 — 157 patients; estimates carry wide confidence intervals.
Overall survival is immature — only 14 deaths total; the OS confidence interval crosses 1.0.
Generalizability — patients with prior neoadjuvant or perioperative systemic therapy were excluded.
Mechanism — the functional link between specific post-treatment T-cell clones and vaccine-encoded neoantigens is not yet established.